Jack Ma: Tai Chi is not born for fighting for street fighting, but cannot explain any problem

　　Recently, the "fighting madman" Xu Xiaodong competed with Tai Chi master Lei Lei, and the question of whether Tai Chi is suitable for actual combat has also aroused questions. This morning, Jack Ma said on Weibo that Tai Chi, as a type of boxing, must be able to fight in practice, but there are indeed not many people who can fight, and it is even rarer to become a martial arts master. Most people are actually practicing Tai Chi, or just enthusiasts in the Tai Chi park.

　　Jack Ma said that Tai Chi was not originally created for martial arts, but a movement that uses fists to explain Tai Chi philosophical thoughts. That "match" is a typical street fight caused by bickering. Even ordinary competitions cannot be regarded as, without any skills or viewing. Tai Chi is not born for fighting, but the first day of modern free fighting is born for fighting. A street fight cannot explain any problem. What's more, using the fighting ability of free fighting to compare with the fighting ability of Tai Chi, the rules are inconsistent, and there is no way to talk about it.

　　Jack Ma finally said. In the face of guns, cannons, even missiles, and nuclear bombs, all martial arts are "all the same as people falling into the world". Why are they too anxious to fight each other? Therefore, today, instead of seeking to win others in martial arts, people who practice martial arts are better seeking to win themselves in martial arts.

　　It is understood that after the game, Xu Xiaodong gave a letter of war to Jack Ma's bodyguard (because he also practices Tai Chi), and said that he could defeat him in 3 minutes, but Xu Xiaodong believed that Jack Ma's bodyguard would not fight him.

　　The following is the full text of Jack Ma’s Weibo

　　Time difference essay----Tai Chi and Free Fighting

　　In the past few days, the "fighting scene" of a Tai Chi amateur "lovers" and a "quasi-professional" free fighting player has attracted extraordinary attention. This was originally a "private fight" among the people, but with the help of Internet media, it actually caused a dispute among major "martial arts sects". . . Haha, this is a "show" that interacts best with "actors" and "actors". Some people are even angry about it and take it seriously!

　　I am also a pseudo-box fan who loves Tai Chi and free fighting for many years. From childhood to adulthood, even if I watch two chickens fight, I'm willing to go and see it a few miles. I have read novels such as Jin Yong, Gu Long, Liang Yusheng countless times. Whether it is MMA or UFC competitions, I can't turn off the TV at all. Since I was in college, I have not been able to follow the Tai Chi teachers. . . I have been practicing boxing for a long time and have been amateurs, but since I was 21 years old, I have never had the chance to participate in the "fight", so I have not lost in a few decades. . . So like all men, I often boast about the glory of the past in front of my children.

　　Can Tai Chi be actually combated? The answer is yes. Tai Chi is definitely capable of practical combat as a type of boxing, but there are indeed not many people who can really fight, and it is even rarer to become a martial arts master. Most people are actually practicing Tai Chi, or just enthusiasts in the Tai Chi park.

　　Tai Chi was originally not created for martial arts. It is a movement that uses fists to explain Tai Chi philosophical thoughts. Fighting is only part of Tai Chi, not all. Tai Chi uses boxing to experience the changes in yin and yang, the transformation of virtual and real, the combination of movement and stillness, the upper and lower parts follow each other, and the abandonment of oneself follows others. . . . Every time a true Tai Chi master goes to the strife, pushes hands and practices boxing, he repeatedly ponders and experiences Tai Chi philosophical thoughts while exercising his body.

　　As for practicing Tai Chi to achieve a magical skill of "one feather cannot be added, flies cannot fall; people do not know me, I know people only; heroes are invincible", they are geniuses who have never produced a hundred years, and there are very few, only a few ancestors such as Yang Luchan and Sun Lutang. Moreover, today's Tai Chi competition has basically become a brute force battle of "breaking the weak with strength, slow and fast, and fighting with strength without strength". But today there are many people who boast about their Tai Chi magic skills. Tai Chi is indeed a good kung fu, and real kung fu is practiced through time and diligence. Besides, how many men who know some martial arts are not bragging about it now? ! hehe

　　Everyone thinks that Tai Chi is a big deal, and these four liang are the four liang of Tai Chi, not the brute force four liang. This is a kind of cultivation. There are almost no one in the world who can truly cultivate Tai Chi Siliang.

　　As for the park Tai Chi, it itself is a kind of "early training culture". He laughed and stood out among a group of old men and women, and exchanged ideas. Finally, under the envious eyes of many old men and women, he left and took a sip of wine when he went home. Although it is a bit of a heroic spirit of "killing Nanshan Nursing Home and kicking Beihai Nursing Home", it is so great that you are happy with something. Why do you have to say that people are cheating? Haha, this is just a culture of the world that people are immersed in their own YY.

　　In short, Tai Chi can definitely be used. At least there is still a very different person who has practiced and has never practiced. He can't recognize punches. After all, there are not many masters in street fighting. The famous fun of practicing Tai Chi does not come from fighting, but from understanding Tai Chi from fighting. The era of cold weapons has long ended, and Tai Chi should be a cultural fun.

　　Is this "fight" fair? To be honest, this is a typical street fight caused by bickering. Even ordinary competitions cannot be called a normal competition. It has neither techniques nor viewing. The only special thing is that there are a lot of onlookers, and the melon-eating people make a fuss to watch a bigger show. After the cheering, it goes up to whether Tai Chi can be played, whether martial arts are useful, and whether traditional culture is useful. . .

　　Tai Chi is not born for fighting, but the first day of modern free fighting is born for fighting. If it is really for the sake of fighting, free fighting will indeed progress quickly and the effect will be obvious. But if you hope to be able to fight after the age of 50 and have fun, Tai Chi may be the best choice. Generally speaking, after the age of 50, people who practice free fighting can basically only sit in the stands and "remember the past" because the speed and strength at that time were no longer good, while Tai Chi emphasizes flexible skills, and practicing until the age of 50 may be in their prime.

　　A street fight cannot explain any problem. What's more, using the fighting ability of free fighting to compare with Tai Chi's fighting skills, the rules are inconsistent, and there is no way to talk about it. It's like you have to compare the number of goals scored by basketball with the number of goals scored by football. It's like you have to compare football with duck and chicken. If it is a competition, the rules must be set first. Today, even cricket fights must be weighed first.

　　All sports have their own fun and their own rules. Fencing was originally an early duel technique in Europe. Swordsmanship determines life and death, and now it is just a sports event; in modern civilization, fist, sword, sword, and stick are basically a kind of sports fun. In the face of guns, cannons, even missiles, and nuclear bombs, all martial arts are "all the same as people falling into the world". Why are they too anxious to fight each other? Therefore, today, instead of seeking to win others in martial arts, people who practice martial arts are better seeking to win themselves in martial arts.